1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 332 (1933)
 

SAMPLINER v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

No. 6132.

63 F.2d 332 (1933)

SAMPLINER et al. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 17, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Doerfler, of Cleveland, Ohio (Bloomberg & Wolf, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

W. C. Keough, of Cleveland, Ohio (Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough & Beam, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HICKS, HICKENLOOPER, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Decision necessitates the interpretation of a written obligation executed by appellants' decedent, Samuel S. Sampliner, to indemnify the appellee against loss upon a surety bond written by it for another. The sole question involved relates to the admissibility of evidence offered by the appellee to explain the writing and to identify its subject-matter. The facts sought to be established by parol evidence are not disputed. The result must be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases