STANLEY CO. v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.

Nos. 985, 996, 997.

5 F.Supp. 380 (1933)

STANLEY CO. OF AMERICA, Inc., v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al. DUOVAC RADIO CORPORATION v. SAME. GENERAL TALKING PICTURES CORPORATION v. SAME.

District Court, D. Delaware.

December 4, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and George E. Quigley, both of New York City, for plaintiff Stanley Co. of America.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and Ephraim Berliner, both of New York City, for plaintiff General Talking Pictures Corporation.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for plaintiff Duovac Radio Corp.

George F. Hurd (of Greene & Hurd), C. M. Bracelen, and John H. Ray, all of New York City, and Marvel, Morford, Ward & Logan, of Wilmington, Del., for defendants.


NIELDS, District Judge.

Motions were filed by defendants (1) for a bill of particulars under Equity Rule 20 (28 USCA § 723), and (2) for discovery under Equity Rule 58 (28 USCA § 723) in three suits against American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., and Electrical Research Products, Inc. (referred to as "Telephone," "Western," and "Products," respectively), under section 16 of the Clayton Act (15 USCA § 26) to restrain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases