1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 302 (1933)
 

KING v. SIX COMPANIES

No. 6945.

63 F.2d 302 (1933)

KING v. SIX COMPANIES, Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 6, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Duffill and Harry H. Austin, both of Las Vegas, Nev., for appellant.

Henderson & Marshall, of Las Vegas, Nev., for appellees Anderson.

McNamee & McNamee, of Las Vegas, Nev., and Redman, Alexander & Bacon, and Herbert Chamberlin, all of San Francisco, Cal., for Six Companies, Inc.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ST. SURE, District Judge.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff was injured by an explosion of gases in a fire box of a steam boiler located on the Hoover Dam project in Boulder City, Clark county, Nev. At that time he was unemployed, but had gone to the town for the purpose of seeking employment with the Six Companies, the corporation which was building the Hoover Dam. The day before the accident (August 4, 1931) he had received some assurance from employees of the Six Companies that he might...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases