1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 65 F.2d
  5. 65 F.2d 208 (1933)
 

SHOEMAKER v. NEWMAN

No. 5202.

65 F.2d 208 (1933)

SHOEMAKER et al. v. NEWMAN et al.

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

Decided April 24, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanton C. Peelle, Walter B. Guy, Frederic B. Warder, and Ralph D. Quinter, all of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Wilton J. Lambert, R. H. Yeatman, George D. Horning, Jr., John S. Flannery, and W. C. Sullivan, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in a suit by appellees, Enos S. Newman and Edwin A. Mooers, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Pierce Shoemaker, deceased, for a construction of certain trust provisions contained in the will.

The provisions of the will bearing upon this controversy are as follows: "I give, devise, and bequeath, all the rest, residue, reversion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases