1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 200 (1933)
 

GOLDBERG v. EMBROIDERERS' NEW YORK PAPER CO.

5 F.Supp. 200 (1933)

GOLDBERG et al. v. EMBROIDERERS' NEW YORK PAPER CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 12, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warfield & Brown, of New York City (Donald L. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Henry L. Burkitt, of New York City, for defendants.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

Both these motions are denied.

I. As to the motion to dismiss the complaint:

On September 16, 1931, this patent was adjudicated, and as to claims 3 and 4, read in connection with the specifications, sustained by Judge Coxe in Goldberg v. Orloff et al., and Goldberg v. Sharkey (D. C.) 1 F.Supp. 928.

Therefrom it follows by necessary implication that it has been decided by another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases