1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 120 (1933)
 

HARRIS v. HENRY

Patent Appeal No. 3060.

63 F.2d 120 (1933)

HARRIS v. HENRY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 20, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (B. M. Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Brown, Jackson, Boettcher & Dienner, of Chicago, Ill. (Arthur H. Boettcher and Charles V. Hildebrecht, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an interference proceeding in which the question for determination is the ancillary one of the right of Henry to make the claims which constitute the counts in issue.

The invention relates, generally, to spring shackles, or pivotal connections, particularly for automobile springs; their most common use being in connecting the ends of automobile springs to the frame.

The issues here are narrow, being limited to certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases