1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 178 (1933)
 

O'DONNELL v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION

No. 3549.

2 F.Supp. 178 (1933)

O'DONNELL v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 19, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Woodberry and Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, all of Boston, Mass., and Murray & Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., Harrison F. Lyman and Hector M. Holmes, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants Geo. E. Williamson & United Shoe Machinery Corporation.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

In this suit in equity, brought under R. S. § 4915 (35 USCA § 63), plaintiff seeks to establish his rights to letters patent which were denied to him by the Commissioner of Patents.

Statement of Facts.

1. The subject-matter involved relates to the shoe art, and especially to the re-enforcing and finishing edges of ladies' shoes. In the manufacture of shoes a strip, or margin, is sewed along the edges of the shoe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases