PER CURIAM.
Appellants, in connection with their motions for rehearing, not only reargue the point they presented before, that they received no taxable income in the years 1923 and 1924, but for the first time advance arguments in support of their claim to depletion which, though they had an assignment of error claiming it in the alternative, they did not on the submission of the cause argue either orally or in their briefs, and in regard to which the record contains...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.