CHAPMAN DEHYDRATER CO. v. CRENSHAW

No. 7015.

65 F.2d 69 (1933)

CHAPMAN DEHYDRATER CO. v. CRENSHAW.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Percy S. Webster, of Stockton, Cal., for appellant and cross-appellee Chapman Dehydrater Co.

Chas. E. Townsend and Wm. A. Loftus, both of San Francisco, Cal. (A. Donham Owen, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee and cross-appellant Crenshaw.

Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant and cross-appellee brought a suit for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,464,338, issued on August 7, 1923, to R. L. Puccinelli, which will be hereinafter referred to as the "Puccinelli patent," principally utilized for the drying of fruit. The appellee and cross-appellant denied the infringement, and asserted that claims 1 and 2 of the aforementioned patent were invalid, pleaded that a number of prior patents and uses anticipated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases