1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 118 (1933)
 

KELLOGG SWITCHBOARD & S. CO. v. MICHIGAN BELL TEL. CO.

No. 4459.

5 F.Supp. 118 (1933)

KELLOGG SWITCHBOARD & SUPPLY CO. v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

November 23, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., and Arthur M. Smith, of Detroit, Mich. (Lynn A. Williams, Curtis B. Camp, Clifford C. Bradbury, and C. W. Ooms, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of New York City, and Stevenson, Butzel, Eaman & Long, of Detroit, Mich. (Merrell E. Clark, William R. Ballard, M. R. McKenney, and Henry R. Ashton, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

TUTTLE, District Judge.

The amended bill of complaint in this case asserted infringement of six patents. Four of these, the patents to Winston, No. 1,197,166, to Currier, No. 1,316,477, to Sparks, No. 1,358,182, and to Shull, No. 1,566,622, were withdrawn prior to the opening of the trial in court. This leaves but two patents to be here considered, namely, No. 1,428,762, to Currier, and No. 1,438,170, to Currier.

Patent No. 1,428,762 relates to those features...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases