PORESKY v. PIERCE

No. 75.

64 F.2d 1018 (1933)

Simeon PORESKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis C. PIERCE, Sr., and Louis C. Pierce, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 3, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simeon Poresky, in pro. per.

Arthur B. O'Keefe and Harry M. French, both of New Haven, Conn., for appellees.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

We have examined the printed record and supplemental typewritten transcript of the testimony submitted by the appellant, who has appeared in person, with care, because he, without legal training, has been obliged to argue his own appeal. After such careful examination, we are forced to the conclusion that the motion to set aside the jury's verdict was properly denied. We find no errors in the trial which justify our reversing the judgment entered for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases