1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 62 F.2d
  5. 62 F.2d 1000 (1933)
 

EUGENE, LIMITED v. CHARLES ARNAO CO.

No. 163.

62 F.2d 1000 (1933)

EUGENE, Limited, v. CHARLES ARNAO CO., Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 6, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hulbert & Heermance, of New York City (James R. Sheffield, Murray Hulbert, and Edward W. Vaill, all of New York City of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

William H. Davis, of New York City, James F. Williamson, of Minneapolis, Minn., and John Hoxie, of New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff owns United States patents Nos. 1,720,301 and 1,720,302, issued to Eugene Francois Suter on July 9, 1929. Both relate to the drying of hair on a person's head. No. 1,720,301 had for its primary object the removal of moisture from the hair by the application of heated air directly to and through the hair in a way that would prevent the flow of the air down over the face and do away with the discomfort that entailed. No. 1,720,302...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases