LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Examiner, rejecting, for want of invention over the prior art, claims 18, 19, 21, and 22 of appellant's application for patent; claims 3 to 11, inclusive, 17, 20, 23, and 24 were allowed by the Examiner.
Claim 18 is illustrative of the claims on appeal, and reads as follows:
"18. In blowpipe apparatus, the combination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.