1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 997 (1933)
 

OHIO ASSOCIATED TELEPHONE CO. v. GEIGER

No. 837.

3 F.Supp. 997 (1933)

OHIO ASSOCIATED TELEPHONE CO. v. GEIGER et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, E. D.

June 9, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. G. Fogg, of Cleveland, Ohio, and H. J. Linton, of Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff.

The Attorney General for defendants.

Before HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge, and NEVIN and HOUGH, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ohio Associated Telephone Company, hereinafter designated the company, plaintiff, seeks injunction against the defendant Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, hereinafter referred to as the commission, for claimed confiscation as the result of the commission's final orders of September 26 and October 8, 1930.

Prior to August, 1925, the company, through its predecessor, filed proposed schedules of increased rates for telephone service, and gave bond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases