1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 955 (1932)
 

DAVIES v. SUN LIFE ASSUR CO.

No. 20700.

2 F.Supp. 955 (1932)

DAVIES et ux. v. SUN LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF CANADA.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

October 12, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kahin & Carmody, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Eggerman & Rosling, of Seattle, Wash., for defendant.

CUSHMAN, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Concerning the measure of damages for the wrongful refusal of an insurance company to carry out its contract of insurance it has been said (7 Couch on Insurance, § 1870):

"Sec. 1870. Wrongful Breach or Termination of Contract by Insurer. Although there is no doubt that the wrongful refusal of an insurance company to carry out its contract of insurance gives a right of action to the injured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases