1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 55 F.2d
  5. 55 F.2d 900 (1932)
 

GOLD DUST CORPORATION v. MUNSON S. S. LINE

No. 167.

55 F.2d 900 (1932)

GOLD DUST CORPORATION v. MUNSON S. S. LINE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 1, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rumsey & Morgan, of New York City (Ralph W. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (Oscar R. Houston and James N. Senecal, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

CHASE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The most that may fairly be said of the examination made at Buenos Aires to discover what damage had been caused by the collision with the wall is that it was superficial. The representatives of the respondent simply made such visual examination as they saw fit without moving any cargo, and failed to discover the damage which had been done and which would have been sufficient if discovered to cause a prudent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases