1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 951 (1932)
 

JENSMA v. BENEFIT ASS'N OF RY. EMPLOYEES

Nos. 1596, 1595.

1 F.Supp. 951 (1932)

JENSMA v. BENEFIT ASS'N OF RY. EMPLOYEES. SAME v. SUN LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF CANADA.

District Court, D. Idaho, S. D.

February 19, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rhodes & Estabrook, of Nampa, Idaho, and Richards & Haga, of Boise, Idaho, for plaintiff.

Graves, Kizer & Graves, of Spokane, Wash., and Scatterday & Stone, of Caldwell, Idaho, for defendants.

CAVANAH, District Judge.

While these two actions are brought by the plaintiff against different defendants upon two separate insurance policies, they were presented at the same time, and will be disposed of in this opinion.

The plaintiff is the beneficiary in each policy issued by the respective defendants upon her husband's life. The policies contain in substance identical provisions upon which the plaintiff predicates her alleged causes of action, as it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases