1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 26 (1932)
 

CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO. v. PENICK & FORD

No. 4691.

63 F.2d 26 (1932)

CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO. v. PENICK & FORD, Limited, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 28, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Percival H. Truman, of Chicago, Ill., and Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Dyrenforth, Lee, Chritton & Wiles, of Chicago, Ill. (John H. Lee, Russell Wiles, and Horace Dawson, all of Chicago, Ill., and O. N. Elliott, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, of counsel), for appellee.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and WILKERSON, District Judge.

WILKERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff (appellee here) charged infringement of Widmer patent, No. 1,585,452, for the manufacture of starch. Defendant by counterclaim charged infringement of McCoy patent, No. 1,651,611, for a closed or "bottled-up" wet starch system. The District Court found infringement of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 13, 14, and 18 of the Widmer patent and dismissed the counterclaim on the issue of validity.

The patents in suit are in the field...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases