NASH v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

No. 5965.

60 F.2d 26 (1932)

NASH v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 27, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. A. Meck, of Toledo, Ohio (Meck & Meck, of Toledo, Ohio, and Cowan, Adams & Adams, of Columbus, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

S. B. Randall, of Columbus, Ohio (Henderson, Burr, Randall & Porter, of Columbus, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, MACK, and HICKS, Circuit Judges.


MACK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict for defendant, directed at the conclusion of plaintiff's case. Except for medical testimony, plaintiff was the sole witness. He was employed in defendant's yards at Columbus, Ohio, in several capacities; his primary duty, in which he had been engaged for some four months, was the operation of the sand-drying apparatus in the sand house, of which he had sole charge. In addition, he had several tasks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases