1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 55 F.2d
  5. 55 F.2d 800 (1932)
 

SET-O-TYPE CO. v. AMERICAN MULTIGRAPH CO.

No. 5993.

55 F.2d 800 (1932)

SET-O-TYPE CO. v. AMERICAN MULTIGRAPH CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 5, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. H. Wells, of Dayton, Ohio, and L. C. Spieth, of Cleveland, Ohio (E. H. & W. B. Turner, of Dayton, Ohio, and Cannon, Spieth, Taggart, Spring & Annat, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

C. K. Arter and Ashley Van Duzer, both of Cleveland, Ohio (McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart and George William Cottrell, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the Brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Appeal, under section 129 of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 227 (28 USCA § 227), from an order denying a preliminary injunction. The amended bill sought to enjoin appellee from engaging in certain alleged unfair trade practices. The gravamen of the bill is that appellant manufactured and sold under the name of "Set-O-Type," a device for setting cold movable type in printing segments at typing speed; that it also manufactured type...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases