1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 61 F.2d
  5. 61 F.2d 748 (1932)
 

SIMPLEX PISTON RING CO. v. HORTON-GALLO-CREAMER CO.

No. 1.

61 F.2d 748 (1932)

SIMPLEX PISTON RING CO. OF AMERICA, Inc., v. HORTON-GALLO-CREAMER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 7, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. Clay Lindsey, of Hartford, Conn. (Charles B. Belknap, of Detroit, Mich., and Newton A. Burgess, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Duell, Dunn & Anderson, of New York City, Lockwood, Lockwood, Goldsmith & Galt, of Washington, D. C., and Evans & Markle, of New Haven, Conn. (Carlton Hill, of Chicago, Ill., Ralph G. Lockwood, of Washington, D. C. Charles W. Hills and E. O. McNair, Jr., both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in equity for the alleged infringement of claims thirteen and fourteen of Solenberger's patent (1,670,082), for improvements in piston rings to be used in internal combustion engines. The piston of such an engine has a clearance between itself and the cylinder, which must in some way be filled to avoid the escape of oil into the combustion chamber, and to make a tight seal against the escape of the exploding gases. Moreover,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases