COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SWIFT

No. 6581.

54 F.2d 746 (1932)

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SWIFT.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 5, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, A. G. Divet, and J. G. Remey, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and Otis J. Tall, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.

George M. Naus, of San Francisco, Cal., and Andrew T. Smith and Virgil Y. Moore, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.


WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner seeks to review an order of the Board of Tax Appeals reversing a determination by petitioner of a deficiency income tax for the year ending December 31, 1924. The sole question involved in the controversy is whether or not a sale by respondent of certain oil lands for the sum of $900,000 was consummated within the meaning of that term as used in the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 227) before the 31st day of December, 1921.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases