1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 683 (1932)
 

MOLTZ v. UNITED STATES

No. M-317.

2 F.Supp. 683 (1932)

MOLTZ et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

Motion for New Trial December 5, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis R. Lash, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

John A. Rees, of Washington, D. C., and Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Argued before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and WHALEY, WILLIAMS, GREEN, and LITTLETON, Judges.

On Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial December 5, 1932.

LITTLETON, Judge.

This suit is for the recovery of $6,598.80, interest paid on April 21, 1925, on a portion of an additional tax for 1916 assessed April 16, 1920, and paid May 1, 1923, upon the rejection of a claim for abatement.

The decedent prepared and duly filed with the collector for the district of Georgia, on February 28, 1917, his income tax return for the calendar year 1916 showing a total...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases