1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 60 F.2d
  5. 60 F.2d 528 (1932)
 

SOUTH CAROLINA POWER CO. v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COM'N

60 F.2d 528 (1932)

SOUTH CAROLINA POWER CO. v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION et al. BROAD RIVER POWER CO. v. QUERY et al. LEXINGTON WATER POWER CO. v. SAME.

District Court, E. D. South Carolina.

July 21, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hagood, Rivers & Young, of Charleston, S. C., and Martin, Thompson & McWhorter, of Birmingham, Ala., for complainant South Carolina Power Co.

Elliott, McLain, Wardlaw & Elliott, of Columbia, S. C., and Travis, Paxson, Wallace & Philbin, of New York City, for complainants Broad River Power Co., and Lexington Water Power Co.

John M. Daniel, Atty. Gen., and J. Fraser Lyon, of Columbia, S. C., for defendants.

Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and COCHRAN, District Judge.

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

These cases were before us some months ago on applications for interlocutory injunctions; and the legal questions involved were carefully considered at that time. See 52 F.2d 515. The orders denying interlocutory injunctions were affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court. 52 S.Ct. 494, 76 L. Ed. ___. On final hearing the facts have been stipulated; and, in our opinion, they are not materially different from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases