1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 55 F.2d
  5. 55 F.2d 465 (1932)
 

ROWE v. HOLTZ

Patent Appeal No. 2890.

55 F.2d 465 (1932)

ROWE v. HOLTZ.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 8, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. H. Eschholz, of East Pittsburgh, Pa. (R. E. Marine and O. B. Buchanan, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., Wesley G. Carr, of East Pittsburgh, Pa., and Jo Baily Brown, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.

Charles E. Tullar, of Schenectady, N. Y. (Alex D. Salinger, of Boston, Mass., and Russell A. Warner, of Schenectady, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an interference proceeding involving priority of invention of 13 counts relating to subsynchronous motors.

The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office awarded all 13 counts to Holtz, which was an affirmation of the Examiner of Interferences' decision as to counts 2, 7, 11, and 12 and reversal of his decision as to the remaining counts.

Counts 1 and 7 are illustrative and follow:

"1. A self-starting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases