1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 58 F.2d
  5. 58 F.2d 442 (1932)
 

IN RE WEINGARTNER

Patent Appeal No. 2975.

58 F.2d 442 (1932)

In re WEINGARTNER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 23, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Smith, Jr., and Charles H. Howson, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The claims involved in this appeal are combination claims, and the usual difficulty is presented of determining whether the combination is inventive, in view of prior art cited, in which prior art are found combined elements analogous in principle to the combined elements of the claims, but requiring modification in order to meet the claims. As to certain of the claims, there is also the question of direct anticipation, and as to others the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases