BLAND, Associate Judge.
Certain claims of Wildhaber patent, No. 1,653,686, were copied into the application of Zimmermann and became the counts in the interference which was declared. The law examiner overruled a motion to dissolve which was made by Wildhaber.
The examiner of interferences, after the ruling of the law examiner, resumed proceedings in interference, and since the junior party, Wildhaber, took no testimony and "failed to make sufficient showing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.