WILDHABER v. ZIMMERMANN

Patent Appeal No. 2866.

55 F.2d 442 (1932)

WILDHABER v. ZIMMERMANN.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 8, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard E. Shlesinger, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellant.

Elmer R. Helferich, of New York City (Nathan, Bowman & Helferich, Albert F. Nathan, and Border Bowman, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

Certain claims of Wildhaber patent, No. 1,653,686, were copied into the application of Zimmermann and became the counts in the interference which was declared. The law examiner overruled a motion to dissolve which was made by Wildhaber.

The examiner of interferences, after the ruling of the law examiner, resumed proceedings in interference, and since the junior party, Wildhaber, took no testimony and "failed to make sufficient showing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases