1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 55 F.2d
  5. 55 F.2d 369 (1932)
 

UNITED FRUIT CO. v. PILLSBURY

No. 3013 L.

55 F.2d 369 (1932)

UNITED FRUIT CO. et al. v. PILLSBURY, Deputy Com'r.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

January 9, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. P. Wisecarver, of San Francisco, Cal., for complainants.

George J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and Francis J. Perry, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

LOUDERBACK, District Judge.

This case involves an interpretation of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act March 4, 1927, c. 509, § 22, 44 Stat. 1437, 33 USCA § 922. The facts are as follows: One Bert King was in the employ of the United Fruit Company on September 2, 1930, at San Francisco Harbor in the Thirteenth Compensation District, and while performing stevedoring services for said employer on board the steamship San Mateo, then afloat...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases