1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 59 F.2d
  5. 59 F.2d 351 (1932)
 

NELSON v. BERRY

Patent Appeal No. 2923.

59 F.2d 351 (1932)

NELSON v. BERRY et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 20, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ramsey & Kent, of New York City (Frank J. Kent and George Ramsey, both of New York City, and Charles S. Grindle, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., Richey & Watts and F. M. Bosworth, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Donald A. Gardiner, of Washington, D. C. (Verne A. Trask and G. B. Schley, both of Indianapolis, Ind., and Harold F. McNenny, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellees.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

Except as hereinafter related, Jardine, whose name appears in the caption in the relation of an appellee, is not a party to the appeal before us, and the issue upon the merits of the four interferences involved is solely between Nelson and Berry.

A series of interferences were declared by the proper tribunals of the United States Patent Office between respective applications of different parties for patents, the subject-matter of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases