COWELL v. DUCAS


2 F.Supp. 1 (1932)

COWELL v. DUCAS et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 30, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Gevirtz, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Alfred McCormack, of New York City, for defendant Hensel.

Chadbourne, Hunt, Jaeckel & Brown, of New York City (Clinton DeWitt Van Siclen, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Alexander J. McLanahan.


WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The complaint herein is dismissed because it does not contain such allegations as are necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this cause on the basis of diversity of citizenship. There will, however, be given leave to amend within twenty days on the conditions hereinafter set forth.

In view of the jurisdictional infirmity of the complaint, I am unable to deal with these motions which involve questions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases