1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 227 (1932)
 

MARIO TANZI & BROS. v. TANZI

Nos. 5597, 5613.

1 F.Supp. 227 (1932)

MARIO TANZI & BROS., Inc., et al. v. TANZI. SAME v. WILLIAMSBURG MACARONI MFG. CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

June 28, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Sprung, of New York City (Ezekiel Wolf, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Leonard E. Ruisi, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Ralph E. Slayton, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

INCH, District Judge.

These two patent suits were duly tried together. In the first suit, plaintiffs, the owners of the patent in question, sued the inventor, who has apparently associated himself with the corporation defendant in the second suit.

The defense interposed by the defendant inventor is that there has been no infringement. The defenses of the corporation are that the patent is invalid and that there has been no infringement.

The trial was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases