NEW YORK BRICK HANDLING CORP. v. JOHN P. CALLAGHAN, INC.

No. 4648.

57 F.2d 135 (1932)

NEW YORK BRICK HANDLING CORPORATION v. JOHN P. CALLAGHAN, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 1, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. P. Goepel, of New York City, Charles R. Fenwick and Joseph Dugan, both of Washington, D. C., and W. Holt Apgar, of Trenton, N. J., for appellant.

Munn, Anderson, Stanley, Foster & Liddy, of New York City, and Arthur T. Vanderbilt, of Newark, N. J. (Samuel W. Foster, Sylvester J. Liddy, and Albert J. Clark, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.


DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court dismissing the bill of complaint on the ground that the defendant did not infringe the plaintiff's letters patent No. 1,192,504, issued July 25, 1926, relating to brick lifters.

The validity of the patent was not adjudicated and infringement alone is involved here.

The plaintiff's device is a lifter designed to move, in one operation, a stack of bricks, such as a wagon load...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases