HORD v. UNITED STATES

No. L-491.

59 F.2d 125 (1932)

HORD v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

June 6, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. W. McReynolds, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

John W. Hussey, of Washington, D. C., and Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen. (H. C. Clark, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHALEY, WILLIAMS, and GREEN, Judges.


LITTLETON, Judge.

The question in this case is whether the plaintiff may maintain this action to recover an additional tax for 1918 of $3,962.38 paid April 6, 1927, and $729.73, offered and accepted April 12, 1927, in compromise of a 5 per cent. penalty of $198.12 and interest of $1,439.45 on the deficiency, or either of such amounts.

It is urged by the plaintiff, first, that there was no valid compromise since collection of the deficiency, penalty, and interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases