PER CURIAM.
These appellants are convicted of violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). There were two indictments, each containing several counts against these appellants, and the two cases were consolidated for trial. A number of alleged errors are urged in argument, the principal ones being that the verdict was not sustained by sufficient evidence; that the court erred in receiving in cross-examination of appellant Gemma certain testimony. The evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.