1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 54 F.2d
  5. 54 F.2d 1006 (1932)
 

NASH v. UNITED STATES

No. 228.

54 F.2d 1006 (1932)

NASH et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 4, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel & Corn, of New York City (Isaac Siegel and Jacob Corn, both of New York City, of counsel), for Richard Nash.

Sylvester & Harris, of New York City (Charles L. Sylvester, of New York City, of counsel), for Philip de Stefano.

George Z. Medalie, U. S. Atty., and John A. Wilson, both of New York City (Livingston Hall, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The guilt of the defendants is so plain that only some serious blunder in the conduct of the trial should result in a reversal. Today, under section 391 of title 28 of the U. S. Code (Jud. Code, § 269, 28 USCA § 391), we no longer assume that all errors are prejudicial, but regard the whole record with an eye to the substantial correctness of the result. Haywood v. U. S., 268 F. 795 (C. C. A. 6); Simpson v. U. S., 289 F. 188 (C. C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases