1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 59 F.2d
  5. 59 F.2d 998 (1932)
 

OVERMAN CUSHION TIRE CO. v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 432.

59 F.2d 998 (1932)

OVERMAN CUSHION TIRE CO., Inc., et al. v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 20, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City (David A. Woodcock and Lawrence Bristol, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Robert W. Byerly, of New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Morrison, Kennedy & Campbell, of New York City (F. O. Richey, B. D. Watts, and H. F. Schneider, all of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The appellant's bill for intervention, seeking the right to participate in the damages or profits recoverable against the appellee Goodyear, an infringer of the Overman patent, No. 1,092,078, granted March 31, 1914, for a tire, was dismissed below. In a suit by Overman against Goodyear, the patent was held valid and infringed [Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (C. C. A.) 40 F.2d 460...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases