1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 60 F.2d
  5. 60 F.2d 976 (1932)
 

THE M. M. O'BRIEN

Nos. 12484, 12618.

60 F.2d 976 (1932)

THE M. M. O'BRIEN. THE PRR NO. 33. DAVID E. WILLIAMS & CO. v. SARGENT BARGE LINE, Inc. SARGENT BARGE LINE, Inc., v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 13, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston (by R. F. Shaw) of New York City, for David E. Williams & Co.

Thomas A. McDonald, of New York City, for Sargent Barge Line, Inc.

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper (by C. I. Clark) of New York City, for Pennsylvania R. Co.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The two above entitled actions were by stipulation tried together, and as they both arise out of the same happening, one opinion will suffice.

In the first above-entitled action, Pennsylvania Railroad Company and steamtug PRR No. 33 were, on the petition of Sargent Barge Line, Inc., respondent and claimant of the barge M. M. O'Brien, impleaded under the Fifty-Sixth Rule in Admiralty (28 USCA § 723).

The first above-entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases