1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 100 (1932)
 

FRICK CO. v. RUBEL CORPORATION

No. 5100.

1 F.Supp. 100 (1932)

FRICK CO. v. RUBEL CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. New York.

June 9, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wise & Seligsberg, of New York City (Leon Lauterstein, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Jacob A. Freedman, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Irving C. Maltz, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that there is an existing final judgment of this court which is a bar to the maintenance of the present action, and upon the further ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

In this case diversity of citizenship is alleged in the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases