IN RE DAVIDSON

Patent Appeals Nos. 2838, 2839.

54 F.2d 956 (1932)

In re DAVIDSON (two cases).

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 1, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White, Prost, Flehr & Lothrop, of San Francisco, Cal. (Charles M. Thomas, Francis D. Thomas, and James P. Burns, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The issues involved in these two appeals from decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office are so similar in their nature as that the cases were briefed and orally argued together. We therefore dispose of them in a single opinion.

Both applications relate to the subjectmatter of stationary traffic signals of the reflector type, designed to be placed at danger points on highways. In appeal No. 2838, certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases