HEADLEY & THOMPSON v. BRIDGES

Patent Appeal No. 2872.

48 F.2d 938 (1931)

HEADLEY & THOMPSON v. BRIDGES.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 29, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byrnes, Stebbins, Parmelee & Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Clarence P. Byrnes and Earle L. Parmelee, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.

Emery, Booth, Varney & Holcombe, of Washington, D. C. (Amasa M. Holcombe and Charles F. Miller, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Law Examiner, dissolving an interference as to certain counts on the ground of nonpatentability.

The cause was advanced upon our docket in order that it might be heard upon the single question of jurisdiction; it being agreed that, if the court finds itself without jurisdiction to determine now the question of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases