1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 928 (1931)
 

GOLDBERG v. ORLOFF

1 F.Supp. 928 (1931)

GOLDBERG v. ORLOFF et al. SAME v. SHARKEY.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 16, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Blumenthal, of New York City (Asher Blum and David J. Moscovitz, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Jeanette E. Kozlowsky, of New York City, for defendants M. Orloff & Sons.

Munn, Anderson, Stanley, Foster & Liddy, of New York City (Albert J. Clark, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Perforated Pattern Co.

COXE, District Judge.

These are motions to confirm reports of a master in two patent cases involving the Goldberg patent, No. 1,723,729, dated August 6, 1929, for an appliqué fabric. The references were to hear and report, and the master, in each case, has found the patent void for lack of invention; and to adverse findings in that respect the plaintiff has filed exceptions which have been argued simultaneously with the motions to confirm.

In each of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases