This was an action for deceit in inducing the plaintiffs to enter into contracts. At the close of the plaintiffs' evidence the court ordered a verdict for the defendant. Under such circumstances, the plaintiffs were entitled to have their evidence considered in its aspect most favorable to them. Gray v. Davis, etc. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 57; Union Pacific R. R. v. Huxoll,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KEELER v. FRED T. LEY & CO.
No. 2544.
49 F.2d 872 (1931)
KEELER et al. v. FRED T. LEY & CO., Inc.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 16, 1931.
May 16, 1931.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lothrop Withington, of Boston, Mass. (Edward C. Park and Withington, Cross, Proctor & Park, all of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellants.
Herbert Parker, of Boston, Mass. (Charles G. Gardner and William V. Baldwin, both of Springfield, Mass., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BINGHAM, ANDERSON, and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
