KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
I am of the opinion that the master erred in holding that the angle bar type of structure manufactured by the defendant, exemplified by the Plaintiff's Accounting Exhibit M, did not fall within the claim of the patent in suit and was not an infringing device.
The essence of the patent lies in the following distinguishing characteristics of the bar: (1) Ability to be bent, in order to meet what may be called major disalignments...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
