IN RE MURRAY

Patent Appeal No. 2605.

46 F.2d 830 (1931)

In re MURRAY et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 11, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milans & Milans, of Washington, D. C. (Usina & Rauber, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Examiner, rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 to 9, inclusive, of appellants' application, as defining nothing patentable over the prior art. The appeal as to claim 5 has been withdrawn by appellant, and therefore requires no consideration by us.

Claims 1 and 7 are illustrative, and read as follows:

"1. In electric...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases