1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 54 F.2d
  5. 54 F.2d 813 (1931)
 

STEINFUR PATENTS CORP. v. MOOS FUR DYEING CORP.

No. 5504.

54 F.2d 813 (1931)

STEINFUR PATENTS CORPORATION v. MOOS FUR DYEING CORPORATION et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

December 23, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Evarts, of New York City (Morris H. Wolsky, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Morris & Samuel Meyers, of New York City (James N. Catlow, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

INCH, District Judge.

The plaintiff's patents, here involved, have been duly adjudicated to be valid in prior suits against other parties. Plaintiff, at the time of filing its complaint in this suit, filed certain interrogatories.

There has been considerable delay in obtaining answers to these interrogatories. Whether this was due to plaintiff or defendant or both is now immaterial. Suffice it to say that during all this time defendants have never filed objections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases