CLEVELAND AUTOMATIC MACH. CO. v. NATIONAL ACME CO.

No. 5677.

52 F.2d 769 (1931)

CLEVELAND AUTOMATIC MACH. CO. v. NATIONAL ACME CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 9, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Weld Peck, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Fay, Oberlin & Fay and A. M. Brown, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

C. A. Weed, of New York City (Thompson, Hine & Flory, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Dolle, O'Donnell & Cash, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN and HICKS, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.


HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit upon alleged infringement of patent No. 1,092,462, for a Metal Working Machine, granted April 7, 1914, to Enoch Trobeck, and assigned to appellee. Claims 3, 4, 5, 12, and 13 are involved. The defenses were: (1) Lack of invention; (2) anticipation by prior patents, uses, and publications; (3) that the specifications of the patent are incomplete, uncertain, and ambiguous; and (4) noninfringement. The District Court held all the claims valid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases