1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 49 F.2d
  5. 49 F.2d 28 (1931)
 

MILLS NOVELTY CO. v. MONARCH TOOL & MFG. CO.

No. 5642.

49 F.2d 28 (1931)

MILLS NOVELTY CO. v. MONARCH TOOL & MFG. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 20, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl S. Lloyd, of Chicago, Ill. (Arthur H. Stuart, of Chicago, Ill., William R. Wood and Edmund P. Wood, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, Kirkland, Fleming, Green & Martin, of Chicago, Ill., and Wood & Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Walter Murray, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Murray & Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKS, Circuit Judges.

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Infringement suit upon two patents for coin controlled mechanically played instrument, one issued September 19, 1916, on application filed July 10, 1909, No. 1,198,860, to Lesley and Enz (hereafter called Enz) and one issued September 19, 1916, on application filed December 16, 1910, No. 1,198,861, to Lesley and Schoen (hereafter called Schoen).

The District Court's opinion held that Enz was invalid for lack of invention; that Schoen...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases