1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 48 F.2d
  5. 48 F.2d 718 (1931)
 

DAVIS v. HAMILTON COUNTY, TENN.

No. 5617.

48 F.2d 718 (1931)

DAVIS v. HAMILTON COUNTY, TENN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 15, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn. (H. G. Fowler and S. F. Fowler, both of Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellant.

Frank Spurlock, of Chattanooga, Tenn. (Will F. Chamlee and Brown & Spurlock, all of Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The opinion on the first appeal of this case is reported in (C. C. A.) 278 F. 593. Whether the contract which Davis made with the bridge committee provided, in terms or by implication, that his total compensation was not to exceed 5 per cent. of the expenditures for a bridge costing not in excess of $500,000, was not determined on that appeal. The question decided was that the ratification by the county, after the dismissal of Davis, of contracts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases