COMMISSIONER OF INT. REV. v. STEPHENS-ADAMSON MFG. CO.

No. 4413.

51 F.2d 681 (1931)

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. STEPHENS-ADAMSON MFG. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

July 27, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Dean P. Kimball, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.

Lester B. Mann, of Chicago, Ill., and Lee I. Park and Charles D. Hamel, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and BARNES, District Judge.


EVANS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Petitioner argued that because the patent was not issued until 1918, the only basis for computing its depreciation was its cost, and, as its cost was nothing, the substantial allowances made by the Board of Tax Appeals for depreciation were unauthorized.

Article 167, Regulations 45 of the Treasury Department, reads as follows: "Art. 167. Depreciation of patent or copyright. — In computing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases