1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 48 F.2d
  5. 48 F.2d 670 (1931)
 

IN RE LEASK

Patent Appeal No. 2692.

48 F.2d 670 (1931)

In re LEASK et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 22, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meyers & Jones, of New York City (Charles S. Jones, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The invention involved in this appeal relates to a method and apparatus for burning finely divided fuel. All of the apparatus claims and some of the method claims were allowed by the Patent Office. Method claims 1 to 4 were rejected, and it is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner as to these claims, that appeal is taken here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases